Man Sues Parking Lot After Randy Couple’s Romp Destroys His Mercedes

A man is suing car parking bosses in Germany after a randy couple demolished his Mercedes when they had frantic sex on the bonnet.

Image shows the couple in the parking area, undated photo. The act happened in the city of Cologne, in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. (Newsflash)

The romp was so passionate they not only damaged the bodywork but knocked off a wing mirror too.

Car owner Omer Murzoglu, 53, claims that poor security at the underground car park in Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, makes them responsible for the damage.

CCTV footage of the romp reportedly showed the couple walking down and stopping in front of the dark blue Merc C-Class.

Then after stripping off they are seen having sex on the car’s bonnet.

Experts estimate that repairing the damage would cost EUR 4,600 (GBP 4,109).

Image shows the couple in the parking area, undated photo. The act happened in the city of Cologne, in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. (Newsflash)

After car park bosses turned down Omer’s plea for compensation, he turned to law and sued them for negligence.

Omer explained: “I parked my car in the underground car park at the cathedral around 6pm and went to the Covid-19 test centre, where I worked as a night watchman.

“When I got to the car around 8am, it was demolished.”

His lawyer Matthias Siegert-Paar added: “It was clear to us. If you park a car for money in a multi-storey car park that is monitored, then the operating company must be held liable.

“Since they objected, we decided to sue.”

But the lawsuit was dismissed by the Cologne District Court when judges ruled that the car park’s owners were not obliged to monitor the CCTV constantly.

Image shows the report, undated photo. It revealed property damage of EUR 4,600 (GBP 4,110). (Newsflash)

Additionally, court officials who obtained the CCTV footage during the trial did not carry out a public search against the unknown couple.

Chief public prosecutor Ulrich Bremer explained why by saying: “A public search was not legally possible. This would only be done if it was a crime of considerable importance.

“This requirement is undoubtedly not met in the case of an offense involving property damage, even taking into account the amount of damage.”

But Siegert-Paar stated: “We will appeal against the decision of the regional court.”